I to be wondering what i did dorn in the inquiry below:
*
I split the shortcut dissociation energy by two as it produces two Chlorine atoms, and I take it the an unfavorable of Chlorine's electron affinity to discover the sum needed for -443 KJ/mol by solving for x. Any clue what ns did wrong?
Logged
mjc123ChemistSr. Member
*
Posts: 1946Mole Snacks: +281/-12
*

Logged
CyrustorzRegular MemberPosts: 29Mole Snacks: +0/-2
Actually it turns out my concern was just: as I said in my initial post, I split the bond dissociation power by two even though the dissociation power that they provided was already divided by 2 (the dissociation energy for 1/2 Cl2).I appreciate the aid but i don't understand why anyone on this board has to answer therefore cryptically. We all need to take duty for our own finding out after class, so obviously ns realize that if I simply take the prize you provide me ns won't learn anything and also I will fail on the test. You males don't need to be the persons trying to obtain me come think critically... Though admittedly you don't have to be doing any type of of this at all. Therefore again, the help is appreciated.

You are watching: What is the magnitude of the lattice energy for cscl


Ah! ns didn't spot the either. But the point I to be making is that the lattice power is the power for the processCsCl(s)
*
Cs+(g) + Cl-(g)and is a positive quantity. What you to be calculating, properly or incorrectly, was -U.
...I appreciate the assist but ns don't understand why everyone on this board needs to answer for this reason cryptically. We all need to take obligation for our own learning after class, therefore obviously ns realize that if I simply take the prize you offer me i won't learn anything and I will fail on the test. You males don't have to be the persons trying to gain me to think critically... Though admittedly friend don't need to be doing any of this at all. Therefore again, the help is appreciated.

See more: What Are Two Ways Bacteria Can Get Food ? How Do Bacteria Feed


I would suggest that you do not digress through statements like this in a regular thread.We have a forum whereby you can discuss such things.SeeComments for Staff and Comments native StafforGeneric DiscussionYou have done this kind of digression on various other posts and also it leads to a disjointed thread.Some time quickly I will most likely remove the distracting part of the short article on this thread and also possibly the others.